User talk:Piotrus

: 632

: 82

: 6

: 22

You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Wikipedia Signpost today.

This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived. Sections without timestamps (not signed with ~~~~) are archived manually when I get around to it.

Please start all new discussions at the bottom of this page and include a heading. When in doubt, click the "New Section" button above.

If I left you a message on your talk page, please answer it there by indenting one line and starting your response with a ping: {{Ping\|Piotrus}} If you leave me a message here on my talk page, I will answer your message here by pinging you.

Always sign your message (by clicking the sign button or by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~). Thanks in advance.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70

This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by .

I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms.

Lurking stats

Page views for this talk page over the last 90 days

Detailed traffic statistics

DYK for Retelling

On 21 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Retelling, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the retelling of stories can focus on female characters to reflect the feminist perspective? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Retelling. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Retelling), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:02, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Documenting the destruction of Warsaw

Piotrus, as a man proficient in Polish and with broad interests and seemingly boundless energy, you might find something of interest within this. (Well [cough], I can't immediately think of anybody else who might do so.) -- Hoary (talk) 11:53, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ten no Hate Made

hi! just getting back to you on the entries you sent me to look at/information for ten no hate made.

[1] https://ameblo.jp/aisharyoko/entry-12651478782.html - this is a blog and likely doesn't meet the criteria for reliability. while it mostly functions as a review, it does contain some insight that i think is available to source from the hardback editions i found last week, hopefully i'll get round to reading it soon.

[2] https://honkuimusi.hatenablog.com/entry/2022/09/22/080000 - this is also a personal blog and doesn't contain anything specific or sourced to draw from.

[3] https://booklive.jp/product/index/title_id/215654/vol_no/001 - this is a shop link the only thing it may be sourced for is verifying a reprinting that took place on 23 august 2013.

[4] https://renta.papy.co.jp/renta/sc/frm/item/39527/ - this is also a shop link.

[5] https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/13255241 - not sure what the policy is for goodreads, but this verifies that an original hardback collection was released in 1993 (isbn-9784022607485) (asin-4022607483)

[6] http://blog.happyblossom.boo.jp - is a blog that's unrelated to the manga.

[7] https://booklog.jp/item/1/4022607483 - similar to goodreads, it's a japanese book blogging website, also confirms the release date of the hardback.

i saw that manga: an anthology of global perspectives, edited by toni johnson-woods mentions the series a couple of times. not sure there's much information though.

--Plifal (talk) 11:51, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question before AfD

Hi. It seems like you're well experienced when it comes to Afd and notability guidelines. Do you think this article Rebecca Chambers is notable? I feel like [1] is the only sigcov, while this one [2] just only stated that the creator hates her. Thanks! 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 02:02, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Boneless Pizza! Thanks for asking. I am indeed interested in the notability of fictional characters, and I agree many are poorly done; that said, I am also upset when I see longer articles deleted or redirected without even a merger. I agree with your assessment of these two sources; one could argue that second SIGCOV source is provided by https://www.thegamer.com/resident-evil-zero-rebecca-chambers-facts-trivia-didnt-know/ but it is also written in the crappy listicle format, so yeah, this is pretty borderline (no other source in the article mentions her by name). This is a valid topic to bring to AfD, yes, although my vote there would certainly be along the lines 'whatever happens - it is borderline - please merge content (reception) rather than delete. PS. I restored this since I already spend 5m+ looking into this and writing a response. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:12, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Nominating it now. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 02:46, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ten no Hate Made – Poland Hishi

The article Ten no Hate Made – Poland Hishi you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ten no Hate Made – Poland Hishi for comments about the article, and Talk:Ten no Hate Made – Poland Hishi/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vanamonde93 -- Vanamonde93 (talk) 04:24, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Zaziemskie światy

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Zaziemskie światy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SirBrahms -- SirBrahms (talk) 07:04, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. van Wijk

Cześć, Piotrus. I hope your new year is off to an excellent start. Last month, you kindly reviewed my DYK nomination for Nicolaas van Wijk and expressed an interested in reviewing it at WP:GAN if no one reviewed it by mid-January. I'm writing in the hopes you might still be interested, since February is nearly here and no one has begun a review. No problem if the answer is no, but I figured I should ask. Best, ThaesOfereode (talk) 22:39, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ThaesOfereode Thanks for the ping. I'll try to find time next week as this week I am busy with a bunch of other stuff, on and off-wiki, although I can't promise anything. But feel free to poke me :) _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:14, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]